Chairman’s Report
Our AGM will be on the 31st of March at the Highbullen Hotel. We have a speaker from the Environment Agency called Harry Chance. Harry is an Agricultural Regulatory Inspection Officer and will update us on the greater level of enforcement that was first trialed on the Axe and is coming to the Taw.
We are running our annual auction online this year. The link is at the bottom of this piece which can be forwarded to as many people in your network as you feel might be interested. Chris Taylor, as ever, is rounding up auction lots. If you would be willing to donate, be it fishing, stalking, other experieces or equipment, then do email Christopher Taylor ([email protected]) or me ([email protected]). We will continue to add lots and run the end date through into mid April.
We have started the new season with a bang with around 20 fish caught on the lower beats, mainly kelt on the Barnstaple & District Angling Association water. Wisely, they immediately asked members not to spin and then brought in a voluntary cessation of fishing until the next large tide that should carry these valuable fish safely out to sea. I have checked with other rivers and these unusually high numbers have not been replicated elsewhere. They equate to a lot of eggs in our river and will only represent a proportion of the total spawning fish. This gives us some reason for optimism. Any angler who does catch a kelt should take particular care in returning this valuable fish to the water.
We hope the weather is an improvement on the 2022 season. Last year we had a promising start with several early fish caught. The rain then stopped and the summer and early autumn were a complete right-off. Our final figures were a miserable 53 salmon and 83 seatrout. The one lesson is to put in the effort when the conditions are right. Those lucky enough to fish the lower river did have sport in periods the water was cool enough to fish.
The Committee has been working away behind the scenes on protecting the ecology of our catchment. The toughest job was working with Fish Legal on a private prosecution. Alex Gibson coordinated this and his report is in this Newsletter.
There are rapidly increasing numbers of shad spawning in our river, most likely the result of the weir removals assisting their migration. We contacted various researchers through Jo Madden (Upper Taw Representative). An article on this fresh-water breeding herring can be read elsewhere in this Newsletter.
Over the years we have improved access over our weirs, bought out the estuary salmon nets, succesfully lobbied IFCA to ban other estuary netting, monitored fish numbers through fry surveys and beat surveys, collaborated with South West Rivers Association on various lobbying activities, cleaned compacted and silted gravels to assist with spawning, sued polluters and those that damage the ecology of our river and brought a multitude of other benefits. The two major causes of damage we continue to battle are sewage treatment works and poor farming practices. We can’t change these alone and so view collaboration as a necessary strategy. The North Devon Biosphere have a Catchment Partnership and Ian Blewett has a seat at that table as outlined in his article in this Newsletter. A major step forward will be in-river water monitors that have been trialled in the Umber and are now to be introduced in the Little Dart.
William Martin has just completed a new website for us. It will allow greater flexibility, easier communications – such as this email – and also online auctions. Bryan Martin has ably managed our previous website for which we are grateful and will continue to assist with the new one. The new model allows other officers to have direct access alongside Bryan.
Andy Gray
The Mole Pollution Incident
The Mole pollution incident has been extensively covered in
our website over the last 2 ½ years. Now that the legal processes have run their course, I have been asked to write a concluding article. We should remember though that the effect of so many of our fish being killed will be felt in our salmon, sea trout and brown trout fish stocks into the future.
Sadly we have become used to the drip by drip deterioration
in the water quality of our river caused to a great extent by the bad practice of farmers and our water company, South West Water, this despite extensive campaigning efforts for improved regulation and enforcement. There was always a feeling though that a major catastrophe could be around the corner.
I was Chairman when I received a call from the EA on the
morning of 1 August 2020 telling me that there had been a major fish kill incident, Category 1 in EA terminology, as a result of anaerobic digestate used as a fertiliser getting into the Mole in large quantities. For reasons of continuity I stayed involved until all the legal loose ends were finally tied up towards the end of last year.
An estimated 15,600 fish in a 5km stretch of the Mole were
killed, from above the link road to the junction of the Molland Yeo where fortunately sufficient dilution took place. This stretch is an important spawning and juvenile area for the river. The salmonids actually counted by the EA were: 315 salmon parr, 1,155 salmon fry, 14 adult sea trout, 1,127 adult brown trout, 328 brown trout parr and 1,222 brown trout fry. Although no adult salmon were killed the loss of three generations of juvenile salmon will be felt for years to come. The same situation applies to the sea trout killed and to the unknown number of juvenile brown trout killed that would have migrated to sea as sea trout.
The EA mounted a successful criminal prosecution of Alun
Sing’s company and one of his employees. The total fine was £2,667, an amount viewed as derisory by those concerned with the health of the river. The proceeds went of course to the Treasury not to the river. With the criminal prosecution out of the way it was open to us to mount a private action for damages. It turned out that amongst all the riparian owners below the polluted stretch on the Mole and on the Lower Taw only five RTFCA members, a
disappointing number, could be identified as members of Fish Legal. These five, acting as claimants, engaged Fish Legal and after a long, drawn-out legal process compensation of £18,000 was paid. Each of the five claimants agreed that the proceeds should go to the Westcountry Rivers Trust for river improvement work on the Mole and this has now happened.
What lessons can be learned?
Taking legal action in relation to river pollution is a
time-consuming and expensive business which requires specialist skills. This we found out through working alongside Fish Legal and through the excellent efforts of Justin Neal, Fish Legal Solicitor. I do urge riparian owners to protect their own and the river’s interests by becoming members of Fish Legal, thereby in effect insuring against the costs of legal action and making legal action affordable.
Those who pollute our river should be held to account and
pressure needs to be brought to bear on the EA to prosecute Category 1 and where possible Category 2 incidents.
Criminal prosecutions do have a deterrent effect. It is therefore important to decline offers under enforcement undertakings as RTFCA did in this case. By using the enforcement undertaking arrangement and offering money direct to the affected party the polluter seeks to avoid a criminal prosecution. It is important to note that after a criminal prosecution there remains the option, as in this case, of bringing a private action with proceeds going to river improvement work. A successful criminal prosecution by the EA
increases the likelihood of a successful private action.
We will never eradicate all the threats that our river faces,
but we must do all we can to minimise them. This means that anglers should act as eyes and ears on the river and report pollution incidents to the EA via its hotline (0800 807060). It may seem dispiriting that individual cases are not followed up by the EA unless there is a fish kill, but action becomes more likely against the repeat offender if incidents continue to be reported and logged.
Three anaerobic digesters on our system are three too many. There
is always the threat of a major incident directly or indirectly connected to them. I would urge any member who hears of plans for others being built to bring that information to the attention of the RTFCA Committee so that a concerted campaign can be launched to nip such plans in the bud.
Fortunately major incidents are rare and I hope my successor, Andy Gray, has a smooth ride in this respect.
https://fishlegal.net/2022/12/09/anglers-successfully-sue-river-mole-polluter-and-donate-18000-settleme
Alex Gibson
| The ‘May Fish’ – Shad
In recent years Westcountry Rivers Trust has been hearing
reports of shad (Allosa sp.) seen and caught in the Taw, Exe,
Tamar and Torridge catchments. Thanks to those of you that bring these sightings to the attention of everyone and are keen to promote the wildlife in our rivers. The recent Severn Rivers Trust
EU and National Lottery partnership project which aimed to open up the River Severn for shad (Unlocking the Severn) has certainly raised the profile of the species and possibly their notoriety, as they seem to be getting noticed and recorded more.
It is well known that shad exist in the Tamar and whenever they have got over Gunnislake Weir they have been recorded travelling far into the catchment. In the southwest shad have also been recorded in the Taw, with some caught above Head Weir Falls on the River Mole. Considerable numbers have been seen on the Barnstapl & District Angling Association waters.
There are two types of shad, the Allis shad (Alosa alosa) and the Twaite shad (Alosa fallax). Both species look very similar, but pure bred Allis shad tend to be larger than Twaite, which rarely exceed 40cm.
Visually the species are difficult to tell apart, both will have varying markings and body lengths. Having recently spoken to someone who has researched shad for many years, I learned that attempts to identify the species should not be made. Aside from their genetic code, the only reliable way to accurately identify the species is by counting how many gill rakers they have.
There is lots of information if you’d like to know more about their ecology. This can be gleaned from government websites, British Sea Fishing (britishseafishing.co.uk) – has a good, concise summary) and Canal & Rivers Trust where there is a short one-minute ?????SOMETHING WRONG HERE
video through the website.d and edit content here.
Given the conservation importance of shad and their
importance to aquatic biodiversity in the southwest, Westcountry Rivers Trust has obtained some ‘seedcorn’ funding from Natural England to sponsor Layla Ousley, an experienced ecologist who has worked at WRT for over ten years, to survey for shad habitat in the Taw and Torridge. The project will be running to the end of March 2023 with the aim of identifying and mapping potential shad spawning and juvenile habitat within the Taw and Torridge catchments.
We would like the surveys to add to our knowledge of the Taw
so that we can continue our work to recover, improve and enhance our river for all species. We want to create and restore wildlife-rich habitats which provide valuable corridors for wildlife and biodiversity to connect our landscape.
At the end of the surveys we will have an idea of potential shad
habitat availability.This will help us deliver positive action for the Nature Recovery Network. We will have identified key habitats for shad in order to help steer conservation efforts for these species in a catchment that has forged a pathway in opening up migration since 2010.
Defra and Natural England are bringing together partners,
legislation, and funding to create the Nature Recovery Network (NRN). The idea is to deliver the NRN by restoring and enhancing England’s wildlife-rich places. The NRN is a major commitment in
the government’s 25 Year Environment Plan and enacted by the Environment Act 2021. This is where the ‘seedcorn’ funding has originated.
If you have any interesting shad information that may be
helpful to our surveys then please let us know through the normal channels and if you see one or two of us out on the river over the coming months looking for shad; please say hello as usual.
Adrian Dowding
Westcountry Rivers Trust |
|
| CATCHMENT PARTNERSHIPS – THE WAY AHEAD
Many people will not have heard of Catchment Partnerships,
but they are a feature of our life on the river that is here to stay. Catchment Partnerships is the accredited name that Government , in this case Defra and Natural England, gives to a Catchment Based Approach (CaBA).
CaBA is a community-led approach that engages people and groups from across communities, encompassing a variety of environmental interests at a local level to help improve our precious water environments. The idea is to do this to by addressing environmental issues at scale on a catchment basis.
THE NORTH DEVON CATCHMENT PARTNERSHIP (NDCP)
RTFCA is a member of the North Devon Catchment
Partnership. The area covered is depicted on the map below.
You will see that area includes all of the Taw and
Torridge catchments. The NDCP vision states: “Our health and quality of life depends upon the natural environment. As a UNESCO Biosphere, the natural capital in North Devon is recognised internationally. However this has been degraded through unsustainable land use practices, physical modifications and pollution. Climate change is making restoration even more challenging. We believe that the North Devon community and its public, private and charitable organisations, must work together in order to achieve Good Ecological Status in our rivers, estuaries and coastal waterbodies.”
MEMBERSHIP OF NDCP
In addition to RTFCA the following are members of NDCP:
Devon Wildlife Trust, The Environment Agency, Natural England, North Devon Biosphere, North Devon District Council, N Devon AONB, Westcountry Rivers Trust, South West Water
NDCP Priorities are:
– action on on diffuse pollution from agriculture (improving or restoring water quality)
– working with landowners to manage river banks
– encouraging best practice in forestry to reduce sediment pollution removing barriers to fish passage
– investigating the extent of sediment pollution in our river
– tackling the tricky issue of non native invasive species
THE FUTURE
We face a number of significant and daunting challenges to our river’s health and whilst we do our utmost to neutralise or mitigate the effects of the challenges that face us, the reality is that some are just too big in terms of scale and scope to grapple with. The Committee is of the view that we must adapt our approach if
our efforts are going to mean anything and this means partnering with other organisations and forming new alliances in order to deliver the outcomes we want. The NDCP provides us with the opportunity to do just that.
We have been welcomed as a valued member and have already been able to demonstrate our worth through our wide experience of raising funds and delivering environmental enhancements throughout the catchment. The NDCP priorities largely chime with
ours and the interesting thing is that the CaBA is going to be central to Government’s approach to environmental improvements in the future. Indeed, from next year much of Government funding that is dispersed across environmental projects will be channelled down through Catchment Partnerships and much of this we will be eligible for if our case is strong enough. All the indications are that
our experience in delivering collaborative projects on the river will stand us in good stead and the fact that we will now be in line to find and receive Government funding can only be a good thing.
We believe that making new alliances and partnerships will be key to success in the future. The NDCP will be central to that success and the early indications are that we as an organisation have a great deal to offer and will benefit from being part of this alliance. As the old saying goes – you have to be in it to win it.
Ian Blewett
Secretary
SOIL MINERAL NITROGEN SCHEME SAVES FARMERS MONEY AND REDUCES POLLUTION IN RIVERS
A Soil Mineral Nitrogen (SMN) project in Devon delivered through Westcountry Rivers Trust (WRT) has helped farmers save money and reduce the pollutants going onto the land and into rivers.
In 2022, we worked with farmers in the Otter catchment to review their likely nitrogen fertiliser application and how much these had been adjusted due to cost, before sharing the results of nitrogen tests, to allow further adjustments (up or down) to improve the efficient application of N.
Over 425 hectares of conventional and organic land have been
tested. A total of 79 fields have been tested – 50% arable, 33%
grass and the remainder forage cropping (mostly maize).
The results showe significant opportunities for reductions in nitrogen applications, with the majority from the arable fields.
Total applications fell from 57,114kg N/ha to 49,521kg N/ha
– 2,632 kg N/ha of this was due to the high price of N and 4,961 kg N/ha due to adjustments based upon the SMN results.
Based upon a nitrogen fertiliser costing £841/tn in July 2022, the savings equated to over £14K, with an average saving per field of £234. Arable savings were considerably more at £340/field, £148/field for forage and £113 for grassland, with one field’s savings over £1,350.
These are unprecedented times in farming and costs of inputs are increasing, it is good to monitor efficiency across farming systems.
A 7,593kg N/ha reduction in application is the equivalent
of 22tn of nitrogen fertiliser. A lot of possible polutant removed from the system.
The main driver for this SMN work has been to empower farmers to undertake the analysis (where appropriate), to help their on-farm efficiency. This leads to financial savings and an improved environment, including of course water quality in our rivers.
Westcountry Rivers Trust (WRT) has been working with farmers
for more than 28 years, offering impartial and confidential advice on all aspects of the farm.
The picture below shows an operator taking soil samples which can be tested for carbon, nitrogen, phosphorous and a variety of other elements.
Yog Watkins
Westcountry Rivers Trust
|
